Invitation To Pay For Own Meal

XP, Vista: put the record straight.

"Get a Mac" will answer the unconventional way, "their system operation is highly reliable.
Yeah, okay, but not everyone has to be 2000 euros for a machine. So the pragmatist, who has no time to lose and who is aware that the current machine park will be obsolete within 5 years, will take a PC between 500 and 1000 euros with the fatal Windows.

Here we enter the heart of the debate. A debate often booked again and again without ever reaching the certainty. We will remind the general sceptisme widespread with the arrival of Vista: slower, little innovation, accused of XPrelooké system, paranoid, full of inconsistencies, etc..

What really?

After testing the two operating systems on one machine, I was able to forge a clear view enabled me to decide between two user profiles. Begin the comparison;


D one hand we have the brand new Vista
Featuring sleek design and consistent, good fluidity, it can navigate easily. His service pack fixes most of the incompatibilities and the system is stable. What makes
task is its lack of flexibility; each change, task, installation, ask your repeatedly approval prior to launch. It is a blessing in disguise, and this enhances security against intrusion, but makes its use less attractive. Moreover
Windows, making its system more fluid and stable (we have far fewer blockages), significantly slowed its reactivity. A final important choice
vista: Vista manages hardware resources and power tie, and a PC is performing poorly will never be very slow, but a very powerful PC will never be very fast.
Note that the shutdown is very slow, and it starts (it happens quickly in the office but vista preload the software more employees. So the more we used to use many programs, most will start slow. A questionable choice.)

E n conclusion: Vista is an operating system recommended to the casual gamers or PC (for Vista than XP offers new technologies no longer supported) that simply go Internet, listen to music, play movies, play or run any Office application. Vista fulfills the mission of security and reliability (or rather the way Windows reliability).


D e another the Aging XP
We do this well, XP is a malleable system that is not very secure nor very stable. By
cons if you go from XP to Vista you'll find that your system is a rapid and impressive responsiveness.
Because XP does not seek to distribute material resources as vista, and because the current machines have huge capacity for the use made of it (in office).
XP has many concerns (problems closing programs at shutdown, system files too easily editable, ...) but a more experienced user can easily overcome it and make it a reliable system.

E n conclusion: XP will be the choice of the most demanding user, who uses software greediest and know a minimum the Windows environment. It will be immersed in greater responsiveness, flexibility and even greater stability if the system is well maintained.

E as someone who likes to throw lots of applications and do not want the potential of the computer is crippled by the media features of Vista, I decided to re-use XP and I am delighted. With you to make your own.