Funny Waxing Information

STARS AND BOARDS OF THE HOURGLASS

The weekend was productive side images! First, we managed to beat the Irish, although the match was panting, we managed to win the Aviva narrowly Stadium ... What decor this stage Irish, I wonder how the scorers were able to distinguish the poles on the bottom of metal structures everywhere. As for the lack of wind to the stadium spectators La Rochelle, a terrible place close to the ocean where it is still blowing like that and wants when it wants, it gives an impression of serenity in a highly unusual game rugby! Although the battle was tough in the scrums, the silence of penalty kicks had something great! Finally it recognizes us a second victory in the 6 Nations tournament, always good to take even if our performance, without testing, weighed down by the technical super greens, left us a little about our hunger.

Inspired by Tom Hooper, who had seen his mother in a London theater the dark small room behind the Australian scenario, the speech of a king is a movie whose fate is undeniably happy. A success story from the main actor embodies the future George VI. Not easy to "play" stuttering: it does with sobriety. But it is the way that disability is made by the director who made the success of the film: lots of closeups, face framed by Colin Firth in closer, his lips trembling, which abut against the sounds, the involuntary twitching muscles of his face makes palpable the loneliness, and his internal exile. Behind the king, the background is often gray, sad, big empty walls accentuate and emphasize this sense of isolation. Only when a final speech pastel brocade just soften the image.

The story claims the closest historical reality and it seems that Tom Hooper has received a booklet of notes taken by the therapist during these sessions, and found by the grand-son of the latter just before the shooting began. The theme seems initially a little strange and one wonders what will come out after two hours of reel. Admit that keep people sitting in a dark room with little more broth speech therapy, it takes a bit of a challenge! And it works. Director managed to give life to history by introducing what he had to History to give the film a further moral dimension. Sets and reconstructions are impressive accuracy and good taste. Certainly, everyone is nice except the wicked archbishop, and the pathos is flowing yet involved in these scenes. But the human side, thinking about the loneliness of power, the growing importance of charisma in public men, the importance of listening to the fight against disability are also at the meeting. It's funny, poignant, and although it is leaving a little worried for the future of a country whose king is drowning in a drop as small as having to make a speech, it was learned that the formidable Churchill also afflicted with slurred speech yesterday. Finally the war which begins at the last pictures, is still in good lips!

Angela and Tony did, and that justice, unanimously. Like all, I liked the acting, especially that of Gregory Gadebois surprisingly fair and superbly sober. I enjoyed directing actors allowing that there are no false notes and any supporting role is perfectly in tune. The story is well done, the pace is good, in short, for a first film is a total success. A love story that arises from the improbable, which gradually takes shape before our eyes, without Chiquet, no tremolo. In short all is well ... except that I found the film too long so it takes less than 90 minutes. And then I did not understand, but in the end, the fault probably the "violins" fiddling too (I know it's the piano), ribs too steep or very thin script finally, I bored. Do me not stone, but I found the soundtrack to the last sequence so "soap"! Too bad I'm too hard, but just so far the line was light and fine, and this music "happy ending" is not up to the restraint that makes the charm and interest of movie ... And it absolutely necessary for us to understand how heroin is disrupted, we do enter the story with a scene that cold, seemed unnecessarily crude?

smoker who gives the dog at the Avignon Off 2009, Ultimate dialogue is a part of Pierre Charles that we had not seen. The two actors Michel Chalmeau (Brother John) and Michel Le Royer (Gerald) embody two friends, a monk of another journalist, the agonies of impending death of the latter approach in the final exchange. They have not seen for 40 years. Gerard became a reporter. He defines himself as a freethinker, agnostic and apolitical. He has a passion, burning life at both ends. And for him, freedom is the refusal of beliefs and dogma. His friend John has followed a surprise: he withdrew from the world and became a monk. For him life is a temporary death pending real life, eternal life. He is calm, attentive, serene to the point of being infuriating. The theme is attractive, and the two actors play wonderfully. With sobriety, fairness and credibility of what it takes to not stopping the speech. For cons, I found that sometimes the text was an astonishing naivete in the way of putting into words these hot topics that are the big existential questions that trouble the protagonists. Okay I think, for a "public" discourse had to be simple, but I was embarrassed by the side a bit stereotyped, too trite, for certain phrases. This does not prevented me from spending a wonderful evening, because it was with ingenuity, it is good for certain things to be said!

The Ultimate Dialogue
If you have 4 minutes, out of curiosity!